From: Development Control (DMW)
Subject: FW: Planning application
LW/799/CM(EIA) by Bretts Aggregates Limited (BAL): Fishers Wharf, Newhaven
Port.
From: Howe , Steve
Sent: 06 April 2018 13:10
To: 'Jeremy Patterson'
Cc: Thatcher, Aidan; Sharp, Peter; King, Robert; Fitzpatrick, Ian; Cllr
Sharon Davy; Cllr Andy Smith; Chris Gape
Subject: Planning application LW/799/CM(EIA) by Bretts Aggregates
Limited (BAL): Fishers Wharf, Newhaven Port.
Dear Mr Patterson
I refer to your
letter dated 30 October 2017, in which ESCC consulted Lewes DC on the above
planning application.
As you know the
application was reported to Lewes DC’s Planning Applications Committee on 4
April 2018.
The Committee
resolved that Lewes DC advise ESCC that it strongly objects to the application,
on grounds that:
1.
There
is no over-riding need for the development, particularly having regard to the
recent permission granted by ESCC for an asphalt plant, concrete batching plant
and gully waste plant at Plots 6 & 7, North Quay Road (LW/789/CM (EIA).
2.
The
application would be contrary to adopted planning policy CP4 (Encouraging
Economic Development and Regeneration) in Lewes DC’s Joint Core Strategy (JCS),
which indicates “Support for the continued use of Newhaven Port for freight and
passengers including plans for modernisation of the port as identified in the
port authority’s Port Masterplan….” Furthermore, the text to CP4 at para. 7.48
of the JCS states that “Development and job creating opportunities related to
the Port are considered vital to the regeneration of Newhaven and the
surrounding coastal area and to improve the continental ‘gateway’ to the South
Downs National Park”.
3.
The
character of the development would be general industrial and would not accord
with the aims of providing ‘clean, green’ commercial enterprises at the port
(as promoted by the Joint Core Strategy and Port Masterplan). The proposal
would hinder the regeneration of Newhaven by discouraging more appropriate non-polluting
uses and would constitute an unattractive and inappropriate development at the
entrance to Newhaven port, which is the ‘gateway’ to the national park from the
continent.
4.
The
application would generate relatively few jobs, and would therefore contribute
little to local employment prospects and the local economy.
5.
The
general industrial character of the development would be a deterrent to
investment in appropriate planned developments in Newhaven, such as the future
housing at West Quay Marina on the opposite side of the river, to the north at
Eastside and the recently approved hotel development in Transit Road close to
the entrance to the port (LW/17/0205). .
6.
The
development would generate undue noise and dust in the locality, adversely
affecting the ambience of the area, including at the beach, at Tide Mills and
on existing housing on the opposite side of the river.
7.
Lorry
traffic generated by the development would worsen air quality in Newhaven,
which already suffers relatively high pollution levels. The development would
thereby conflict with policy CP9 (Air Quality) of the JCS.
Lewes DC trust that
ESCC will take the above representation into account when the planning
application is decided.
Regards.
Steve Howe –
Specialist (Planning)
This email and any files transmitted with it
may contain confidential or privileged information and are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this email in error, please contact the sender using the contact
details given above, then immediately and permanently delete it. You may
not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or any
attachment.
Although Eastbourne Borough and Lewes
District Councils have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any
attachments are virus free, we can take no responsibility if a virus is
actually present and you are advised to ensure that the appropriate checks are
made.
All written communications sent by and to Eastbourne Borough and Lewes District
Councils are subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000. You should
therefore be aware that this email or the information contained in it may be
disclosed without notice to a third party making a request for information
about the subject matter of this email.
Please do not print this email unless you
really need to.